When you learn physics, you learn many constants.
The one that almost everyone knows is the speed of light,
You'd expect that any physical theory worth its salt would be able to predict the values of these constants, derived from first principles. Right?
Wrong.
For starters, the speed of light is only
G = 6.672·10–11 m3/kg/s2 = 6.672·10–11 m3/kg/(9·1016 m2) = 7.413·10–28 m/kg
Meters per kilogram? That suggests a new possibility. We could make G equal
to one* if only we started measuring mass not in kilograms, but in units of
But we can go a step further. Substituting our new units into Planck's constant, we get:
ħ = 1.0546·10–34 m2kg/s = 1.0546·10–34 m2kg/(3·108 m) = 1.0546·10–34 m2(7.413·10–28 m)/(3·108 m) = 2.606·10–70 m2
What this tells us is that we can set Planck's constant to unity, but this
will fix our unit of length: this fundamental unit will be the square root of
the value above, or
In these "natural" units, all three so-called fundamental constants will be 1. The fact that we're not using "natural" units has nothing to do with physics. It is purely a human choice.
One constant we cannot do away with is the charge of the electron. Once we
have set
4.803·10–10 g1/2cm3/2s–1 = 4.803·10–10 (10–3 kg)1/2(10–2 m)3/2s–1 = 1.519·10–14 kg1/2m3/2s–1
Now we can go a step further and replace seconds with
1.519·10–14 kg1/2m3/2s–1 = 1.519·10–14 (7.413·10–28 m)1/2m3/2(3·108 m)–1 = 1.378·10–36 m
This is the charge of the electron, expressed in (what else?) units of length, i.e., meters.
But we already have a better fundamental unit of length:
You cannot set the fine structure constant to 1 without changing c, G, or ħ. If the fine structure constant is one, either G or ħ must be set to 11.7 (the square root of 137) or c must be set to roughly 0.44 (the reciprocal of the sixth root of 137.)
That the fine structure constant is a relatively small number is a great
blessing to quantum field theory: it allows so-called perturbative methods,
which deal with ever increasing powers of
*We must be careful with this. The gravitational constant appears, among other places, in Einstein's equation, where it is a factor in a relationship connecting tensors of different weight. Thus arguably, G can never be viewed as a truly dimensionless constant.
**This stuff about measuring
everything using units of length actually does make sort of sense intuitively.
Consider: whatever measurement a physicist makes, in the end what is being
measured is a distance. The distance a needle of an instrument or the hand of a
clock travels, for instance. One way to measure time is to measure the distance
a ray of light covers during that period of time. The way to measure mass is to
let two identical masses, separated by a unit distance, attract each other
gravitationally, and then measure their velocity after a unit of time has
elapsed. Velocity, in turn, is distance per unit of time. In other words, once
you have a yardstick, you can measure everything, and a natural standard for a
yardstick is provided in the form of the Planck unit (for that's what it's
called) of